The Hebrew University of Jerusalem - Faculty Research Interests

The Division for Development and Public Relations

DAVID ENOCH, JACOB I. BERMAN PROFESSOR OF LAW

Status :	**********	Birth place :	BRIGHTON (UK)
Office Phone:	02-588-2583	Fax:	02-528-3042
E-Mail:	denoch@mscc.huji.ac.il
U.R.L:	http://law.huji.ac.il/eng/segel.asp?staff_id=63&cat=441&in=441

External Academic Positions

Lady Davis Doctoral Fellowship, Hebrew Univ., 2002-03;
Henry Mitchell MacCracken Fellowship, New York Univ., 1998-
2003; Fulbright Grant, 1998-2000.
Adjunct Prof.: Rutgers Univ., Spring 2000; Tel Aviv Univ.,
Fall 2002; Visiting Prof., Columbia Law School, Fall 2007.
Harrington Fellow & Visiting Prof., Univ. of Texas, Austin,
2009-10.
Member, Young Academy of the Israel Acad. Sci. & Humanit.,
since 2012.
Member: Editorial Board: Theoretical Inquiries in Law,
2005-09; Law and Philosophy, 2009-present;
Legal Theory, 2009-present; Intl. Encyclopedia of
Ethics, 2009-present; Founding editor: Jerusalem
Review of Legal Studies, October 2008-present.
Awards: Cheshin Prize for Young Legal Scholar, Israel, 2009.

Research Interests

Moral, political, and legal philosophy. Metaethics; the relevance of
metaethics to political philosophy. Moral and legal luck.
Epistemology. Vagueness.

Research Projects

Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism - book-length
Authority and reason-giving.
Statistical evidence, sensitivity, and the value of knowledge.

Selected Publications

Publication Title	Year
Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism.	2011
On Mark Schroeder's hypotehticalism.	2011
Not just a truthometer: Taking oneself seriously (but not too	2011
Shmagency revisited. In:	2010
The epistemological challenge to metanormative realism: How best	2010
How objectivity matters. In:	2010
Wouldn't it be nice if p, therefore p.	2009
How is moral disagreement a problem for realism?	2009
Can there be a global, interesting, coherent constructivism	2009
On Estlund's Democratic Authority.	2009
Deontology, individualism, and uncertainty: A reply to Jackson	2008
How are basic belief-forming methods justified?	2008
Luck between morality, law and justice.	2008
Philosophical discussion of and in the law.	2008
An outline of an argument for robust metanormative realism.	2007
Intending, foreseeing, and the state.	2007
Epistemicism and nihilism about vagueness: What's the	2007
Rationality, coherence, convergence: A critical comment on	2007
The case against moral luck.	2007
Meaning and justification: The case of Modus Ponens.	2006
Agency, shmagency: Why normativity won't come from what is	2006
Taking disagreement seriously: On Jeremy Waldron's Law and	2006
Why idealize?	2005
How noncognitivists can avoid wishful thinking.	2003
A right to violate one's duty.	2002
Noncognitivism, normativity and belief: A reply to Jackson.	2001
"Once you start using slippery slope arguments, you're on a very	2001